summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-04-01Delete English namesHEADmasterRunxi Yu
2023-10-29Microblog add <hr />Runxi Yu
2023-10-29MicrobloggingRunxi Yu
2023-10-27Use identity over time PDF insteadRunxi Yu
2023-10-27Identity over time - heading level decreaseRunxi Yu
2023-10-27Identity over time - John Locke EssayRunxi Yu
2023-09-24Modify line breaks in the last poemRunxi Yu
2023-09-23Slight touches to the destroy-not-lose poemRunxi Yu
2023-09-22rain soakRunxi Yu
2023-09-21Another little poemRunxi Yu
我就会在那里 等待着 有人能救救我 我会将我以为对我最重要的人 拽入那个漩涡 他们一一挣脱; 远去 我仍然倔强地伸出我的一只手 试图引人注意 乞讨 展现自己所谓的无助 渴望找到一个人 与我一起 沦 陷
2023-09-21Dry glands weak capillariesRunxi Yu
2023-09-17Drip of Soul to the PufferfishRunxi Yu
2023-09-14In Thaler v. Perlmutter (2023), the Federal District Court for D.C. ruled ↵Runxi Yu
that “Underlying that adaptability, however, has been a consistent understanding that human creativity is the sine qua non at the core of copyrightability”. 17 U.S.C. § 102(a) says that “Copyright protection subsists [..] in original works […] either directly or with the aid of a machine or device”. My question is outside of the scope of this lawsuit: do prompts to AI count as a human using the “aid of a machine or device” to create a creative work? Or, is the transformation from a simple textual prompt to a graphical representation considered transformative under Campbell and 17 U.S.C. § 107, such that the AI is the creator of the secondary graphical work, to the extent that it is not a derivative work of the text prompt? Or would the prompt simply be considered an idea, which is not copyrightable under Baker v. Selden?
2023-09-12Should federal governments prevent overreach of *state* governments?Runxi Yu
2023-09-10Intimate interactionsRunxi Yu
2023-09-10ShockRunxi Yu
2023-09-09Add missing <hr />Runxi Yu
2023-09-08ComediesRunxi Yu
2023-09-04HypocrisyRunxi Yu
2023-08-31PrecedentsRunxi Yu
2023-08-31Melancholy + TZRunxi Yu
2023-08-31Pronouns updateRunxi Yu
2023-08-30Microblog: fear and relationship with the fearedRunxi Yu
2023-08-29Maybe it’s being alive that makes them lie, and being almost not alive ↵Runxi Yu
makes me sort of accidentally truthful… —Brick, Act 3, Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, by Tennessee Williams
2023-08-28BurnoutRunxi Yu
2023-08-25science?Runxi Yu
2023-08-25moral conscienceRunxi Yu
2023-08-25Fold preamble of journey overcoming rationalismRunxi Yu
2023-08-25Perhaps a journey to overcome rationalismRunxi Yu
2023-08-24guilt towards myselfRunxi Yu
2023-08-24trans experienceRunxi Yu
2023-08-24blehRunxi Yu
2023-08-24Internal/externalRunxi Yu
2023-08-24spellcheckRunxi Yu
2023-08-24"""Traditional family values"""Runxi Yu
2023-08-24"Pretty horrible"Runxi Yu
2023-08-24Moral intuitionismRunxi Yu
2023-08-23MicroblogRunxi Yu
2023-08-23Hm, do you think advancements in the understanding of physics couldRunxi Yu
improve understanding on causality, determinism and free will? (“Interpretations” of physics is not my expertise and I’m a bit skeptical, but I’ll try to be careful not to get into mysticism…) (Warning: disgusting) The common argument that collapsing superpositions leads to inherent randomness and thus makes free will possible seems to be misaligned with what people mean when discussing free will. I’ll explain my skepticism with an analogy: A scientist will do something differently if they detect that a radioactive sample decays in five seconds. The scientist’s state and actions depend on random decay of the sample, and I won’t call this free will of the scientist. I don’t think there’s something fundamentally different about the supposed (and really interpretive and perhaps mystic) collapse of superpositions in the brain causing things to go differently, and my example on radioactive decay. No matter if they’re inside or outside the body, truly random events are still spontaneously random
2023-08-22Antinatalism WP linkRunxi Yu
2023-08-22child consent stuffRunxi Yu
2023-08-21https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalismRunxi Yu
2023-08-21fix <sup>th</sup> to thRunxi Yu
2023-08-21Add 于润熙 as my Chinese nameRunxi Yu
2023-08-21they/themRunxi Yu
2023-08-21Consciousness of AIs being irrelevantRunxi Yu
2023-08-21badly written affirmative-action.txt noteRunxi Yu
2023-08-21null hypothesisRunxi Yu
2023-08-20Fix microblogRunxi Yu
2023-08-2017Runxi Yu