From 899635655e977a2688ec3bf2430a08444a2a0004 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Cesar Eduardo Barros Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 22:00:41 -0200 Subject: crypto: more robust crypto_memneq Disabling compiler optimizations can be fragile, since a new optimization could be added to -O0 or -Os that breaks the assumptions the code is making. Instead of disabling compiler optimizations, use a dummy inline assembly (based on RELOC_HIDE) to block the problematic kinds of optimization, while still allowing other optimizations to be applied to the code. The dummy inline assembly is added after every OR, and has the accumulator variable as its input and output. The compiler is forced to assume that the dummy inline assembly could both depend on the accumulator variable and change the accumulator variable, so it is forced to compute the value correctly before the inline assembly, and cannot assume anything about its value after the inline assembly. This change should be enough to make crypto_memneq work correctly (with data-independent timing) even if it is inlined at its call sites. That can be done later in a followup patch. Compile-tested on x86_64. Signed-off-by: Cesar Eduardo Barros Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu --- crypto/memneq.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) (limited to 'crypto/memneq.c') diff --git a/crypto/memneq.c b/crypto/memneq.c index cd016222..570f6f34 100644 --- a/crypto/memneq.c +++ b/crypto/memneq.c @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ __crypto_memneq_generic(const void *a, const void *b, size_t size) #if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) while (size >= sizeof(unsigned long)) { neq |= *(unsigned long *)a ^ *(unsigned long *)b; + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); a += sizeof(unsigned long); b += sizeof(unsigned long); size -= sizeof(unsigned long); @@ -79,6 +80,7 @@ __crypto_memneq_generic(const void *a, const void *b, size_t size) #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS */ while (size > 0) { neq |= *(unsigned char *)a ^ *(unsigned char *)b; + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); a += 1; b += 1; size -= 1; @@ -89,33 +91,60 @@ __crypto_memneq_generic(const void *a, const void *b, size_t size) /* Loop-free fast-path for frequently used 16-byte size */ static inline unsigned long __crypto_memneq_16(const void *a, const void *b) { + unsigned long neq = 0; + #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS - if (sizeof(unsigned long) == 8) - return ((*(unsigned long *)(a) ^ *(unsigned long *)(b)) - | (*(unsigned long *)(a+8) ^ *(unsigned long *)(b+8))); - else if (sizeof(unsigned int) == 4) - return ((*(unsigned int *)(a) ^ *(unsigned int *)(b)) - | (*(unsigned int *)(a+4) ^ *(unsigned int *)(b+4)) - | (*(unsigned int *)(a+8) ^ *(unsigned int *)(b+8)) - | (*(unsigned int *)(a+12) ^ *(unsigned int *)(b+12))); - else + if (sizeof(unsigned long) == 8) { + neq |= *(unsigned long *)(a) ^ *(unsigned long *)(b); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned long *)(a+8) ^ *(unsigned long *)(b+8); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + } else if (sizeof(unsigned int) == 4) { + neq |= *(unsigned int *)(a) ^ *(unsigned int *)(b); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned int *)(a+4) ^ *(unsigned int *)(b+4); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned int *)(a+8) ^ *(unsigned int *)(b+8); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned int *)(a+12) ^ *(unsigned int *)(b+12); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + } else { #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS */ - return ((*(unsigned char *)(a) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b)) - | (*(unsigned char *)(a+1) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+1)) - | (*(unsigned char *)(a+2) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+2)) - | (*(unsigned char *)(a+3) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+3)) - | (*(unsigned char *)(a+4) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+4)) - | (*(unsigned char *)(a+5) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+5)) - | (*(unsigned char *)(a+6) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+6)) - | (*(unsigned char *)(a+7) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+7)) - | (*(unsigned char *)(a+8) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+8)) - | (*(unsigned char *)(a+9) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+9)) - | (*(unsigned char *)(a+10) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+10)) - | (*(unsigned char *)(a+11) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+11)) - | (*(unsigned char *)(a+12) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+12)) - | (*(unsigned char *)(a+13) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+13)) - | (*(unsigned char *)(a+14) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+14)) - | (*(unsigned char *)(a+15) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+15))); + neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+1) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+1); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+2) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+2); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+3) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+3); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+4) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+4); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+5) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+5); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+6) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+6); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+7) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+7); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+8) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+8); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+9) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+9); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+10) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+10); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+11) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+11); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+12) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+12); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+13) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+13); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+14) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+14); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+15) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+15); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); + } + + return neq; } /* Compare two areas of memory without leaking timing information, -- cgit v1.2.3 From cbab377a633a32bcb18d3cee2905ab720e7e921f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 00:33:33 +0100 Subject: crypto: memneq - fix for archs without efficient unaligned access Commit 899635655e97 introduced a possible build error for archs that do not have CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS set. :/ Fix this up by bringing else braces outside of the ifdef. Reported-by: Fengguang Wu Fixes: 899635655e97 ("crypto: more robust crypto_memneq") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-By: Cesar Eduardo Barros Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu --- crypto/memneq.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'crypto/memneq.c') diff --git a/crypto/memneq.c b/crypto/memneq.c index 570f6f34..afed1bd1 100644 --- a/crypto/memneq.c +++ b/crypto/memneq.c @@ -108,8 +108,9 @@ static inline unsigned long __crypto_memneq_16(const void *a, const void *b) OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); neq |= *(unsigned int *)(a+12) ^ *(unsigned int *)(b+12); OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); - } else { + } else #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS */ + { neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b); OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq); neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+1) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+1); -- cgit v1.2.3