wireguard-go.git - A snapshot of wireguard-go

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	tun/netstack: update go mod and remove GSO argument	Jason A. Donenfeld	2021-05-06	3	-16/+18
\| \| \| \| \|	Reported-by: John Xiong <xiaoyang1258@yeah.net> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
*	tun/netstack: bump deps and api	Jason A. Donenfeld	2021-03-06	5	-40/+257
\| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
*	device: return error from Up() and Down()	Jason A. Donenfeld	2021-02-10	1	-1/+4
\| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
*	netstack: further sequester with own go.mod and go.sum	Jason A. Donenfeld	2021-01-21	2	-0/+400
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	In order to avoid even the flirtation with passing on these dependencies to ordinary consumers of wireguard-go, this commit makes a new go.mod that's entirely separate from the root one. Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
*	netstack: introduce new module for gvisor tcp tun adapter	Jason A. Donenfeld	2021-01-21	3	-0/+916
	The Go linker isn't smart enough to prevent gvisor from being pulled into modules that use other parts of tun/, due to the types exposed. So, we put this into its own standalone module. We use this as an opportunity to introduce some example code as well. I'm still not happy that this not only clutters this repo's go.sum, but all the other projects that consume it, but it seems like making a new module inside of this repo will lead to even greater confusion. Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>